Hi all, I dont know if this has been addressed before:
Has anyone ported LAME on a dsp, like motorola 68K...
If so, how many MIPS does it require
on a typical DSP with XY memories, some
multifunctions,
single cycle MAC, some 8K of on chip memory etc?
Or any estimate?
How about the Fraunhofer code (I would like to hear
about an actual implementation).
Thank you very much for your suggestions...
pramila
--- Ivo van Heel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the
> most important
> > factors. But anything you buy today will have no
> problem encoding
> > (even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.
> > My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.
>
> It seems strange that my old Pentium 133MHz (hey,
> it's the best I've got at
> the moment *smiles weakly*) does so bad a job,
> taking up hours and hours for
> one album. I'd say it does about 0.3x with lame, but
> I've heard people say
> their Pentium II 200MHz does realtime?
>
> Ivo
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
> http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
