Hi Ivo!
> Woah, that's pretty big difference, isn't it??
YES
> > b) you use an older, slower version of LAME
>
> Well, it was based on some older versions, I'm now testing it with the
> version
> I have now, which is Lame 3.69. Is there much difference in speed from
> the
> newer versions?
I can't remember, but I think there is a speed increase from 3.69 to 3.80
> But it's still not the 0.61x you got on your 133MHz... I guess that 3.80
> CVS
> is even faster (in CBR)???
>
> > c) your compiler does some strange things
>
> I have egcs-2.91.66, I have heard some bad stories about egcs, though...
Maybe you have compiled the debugging version?
You may take a look at the compiler switches in the Makefile.
Probably your version is without the assembler optimizations?
> > d) your Pentium runs at half speed
>
> What!? :) That seems even less probable and would be pretty stupid :) I
> think
> I would have noticed this long before. Besides, how can such a thing be
> accomplished?
You are right, you would have noticed that a long time before :)
> Ivo
Robert
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
