>>>>> "R" == Robert Hegemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> I can't remember, but I think there is a speed increase from
R> 3.69 to 3.80
Yes there is. I made a more fast/efficient huffman coding.
but another coding change (for thread safe) vailed it...
>>>>> "I" == Ivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I> Allright, my (hopefully ;)) final word on my Pentium 133MHz bad
I> MP3 encoding performance... I just compiled the released 3.80
I> and it's slower (CBR) than what I just encoded with 3.69, as
I> you can see below:
I> Linux shell> lame -h track_07.wav
If you using Linux 2.2.x, you can check your CPU clock simply by
linux shell> cat /proc/cpuinfo
or, 2.0.x, do the same command and check out bogomips line.
CPU clock will be about (bogomipis)/39*100(this is pentium only formula).
I> it's got an Intel processor (which I think should FPU pretty well?),
P54C's FPU is pretty better than the K5,K6,686MX.. with the same CPU clock,
but it was too old... its on chip cache is too small.
between PentiumPro(including celeron, PII, PII) and normal Pentium,
there's about 2x FPU power. K6, 686MX... has more slow FPU. K6-2,III
are also, but they have 3DNow! and it'll be fast (maybe about as twice
as the same clock Pentium) if someone write the code to use it :p
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
