> > The ~0.3x I get on my Pentium 133Mhz is with -h and CBR, but my surprise
> Linux, gcc 2.95.2 compiled, Pentium 166 MMX (200MHz):
> duration 6:30, rate 0.9744
> Win95, Intel4.5 compiled, Pentium 166 MMX (200MHz):
> duration 6:47, rate 0.9345
> Win95, Intel4.5 compiled, Pentium 133:
> duration 10:23, rate 0.6103

Woah, that's pretty big difference, isn't it??

> So, when you get only rates around 0.3x, then there are following possibilities:
> a)    your test song is hard to encode

Possible, but I haven't seen much different rates... so are all my waves that
hard to encode? Improbable...

> b)    you use an older, slower version of LAME

Well, it was based on some older versions, I'm now testing it with the version
I have now, which is Lame 3.69. Is there much difference in speed from the
newer versions?

Anyway, the results, encoding with lame -h track_07.wav, a song called Black
Night, by Deep Purple on my Pentium 133MHz with lame version 3.69:
(as you can see below)

Linux shell> lame -h track_07.wav 
LAME version 3.69 (www.sulaco.org/mp3) 
GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic and noise shaping model version 0.77. 
Using polyphase lowpass filter,  transition band:  15115 Hz - 15648 Hz
Encoding track_07.wav to track_07.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII (11.0x)  qval=2
    Frame          |  CPU/estimated  |  time/estimated | play/CPU |   ETA
  8018/  8018(100%)| 0:08:42/ 0:08:42| 0:09:18/ 0:09:18|    0.4011| 0:00:00 

So, it's a bit faster than the 0.3x I claimed earlier, indeed. I guess this
version is quite a bit faster than the (not so very old) version I checked
it with before. Development is going quite fast, aparantly :)

But it's still not the 0.61x you got on your 133MHz... I guess that 3.80 CVS
is even faster (in CBR)???

> c)    your compiler does some strange things

I have egcs-2.91.66, I have heard some bad stories about egcs, though...

> d)    your Pentium runs at half speed

What!? :) That seems even less probable and would be pretty stupid :) I think
I would have noticed this long before. Besides, how can such a thing be
accomplished?

Ivo

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to