The issue isn't whether Steve in an employee of TI or not. Steve has
made worthwhile contributions, and I'm guessing he needs a lot more
support from TI.
The real issue is why TI made a decision not to provide better support
for Linux users. Linux is clearly winning the majority of embedded
system applications that need a powerful OS, and there are many choices
for systems where Linux is more than what's needed.
Is there anyone from TI that monitors this list and cares to answer that
question?
Sincerely,
David Smead
www.amplepower.com
www.amplepower.net
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Oleg Verych wrote:
Alright! (сдали как стеклотару ;)
@2008-01-17, Grant Edwards:
On 2008-01-17, Vitaly Luban <[email protected]> wrote:
[]
Subject:
MSP430 Info on JTAG and gdb Linux issues
From:
"Patrick James" <[email protected]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:12:29 -0800
To:
"'Vitaly Luban'" <[email protected]>
CC:
"'Underwood, Stephen'" <[email protected]>, "'Rahbar, Ali'"
<[email protected]>
Is this true Steve, do you actually work for TI?
So what?
Please, don't forget "chicken and egg" problem. It *is* possible, that
job was offered just because of the work, MSPGCC developer did.
Vitaly, disclosing private emails is a bad taste. Now, i hope, you can
see how to implement JTAG stuff on PC. What's the problem?
Heck, so many noise around that PC software programming...
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
