слушайте, ну детский сад же! maybe it's better to return to things this mail list was created for? I do not think people interested in personal opinions about TI's business models etc. IMHO, of course. this mail list is about open source product named 'mspgcc', am I right?
also, powerful enough developers community like this, can use it's minds and create a tool replacing the msp430-gdbproxy, and not for flaming here. 2008/1/18, Vitaly Luban <[email protected]>: > > Олежа, ты перепил сегодня, да? > > Oleg Verych wrote: > > >Please, don't forget "chicken and egg" problem. It *is* possible, that > >job was offered just because of the work, MSPGCC developer did. > > > > > > > I couldn't care less. Steve was the one who refused to allow me access, > I repeat. He was asking for some > "proof that I'm a MSP430 developer". WTF? As if the fact that 2 reps, > one from Avnet and another from > Harvey King arranged that is not enough, those guys are making their > money selling chips, including TI made > ones, they wouldnt do what they were doing w/o serious reasons and > expectations. > > But what's most repulsive, it's the behavior. As if it's me, who needs > that stuff from TI, as if I'm a beggar > pleading for a money in some state-funded burocratic pseudo-charity. > Let's set things straight, I don't need > freaking TI. They might as well eat their chips and receive their > salaries in them. I have enough freedom > of components choice and all the technical advantages in the world > wouldn't force me to let anyone to talk > to me as if I'm a beggar and he is charity director. Period. > > >Vitaly, disclosing private emails is a bad taste. > > > > And who you will be to teach me? Self proclaimed etics guru? > > It's just that unlike those who were trying to shun me, blaming in lack > of respect and undermining moral > support to a volunteer, I know what I'm talking about, technical issues > or not, regardless. If I'm in slightest > doubt, I keep silence. So whoever will try to shun me pretending he/she > knows better will get the proof to > the contrary this instant. Its always been this way and always will be. > > > Now, i hope, you can > >see how to implement JTAG stuff on PC. What's the problem? > > > > > > > Now, do you know what are you talking about? What the freaking stuff on > PC? Do you have the slightest > idea what that project was about? I bet not. Do you know where to get > specs on using JTAG to debug MSP > running code without begging for it? Ditto. What you wrote here about > "JTAG stuff on PC" is not only > irrelevant, it's offensive. Thanks g-d that majority on this list who > have not ex-soviet experience don't understand > that. > > So unless you know what are you talking about and you're sure that the > stuff you want to convey has merit > you better be silent, you look less than wise otherwise. ;) > > >Heck, so many noise around that PC software programming... > > > > > > > PC software programming my ass! (very angry) > > Vitaly. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users > > -- _____________ Oleg V. Kobrin
