Thx diana. Much appreciated.

I guess its "buyer beware". Customers will have to research and hope they never 
end up in a nail salon with compromised product ethics.   
 
 
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:08:01 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: {SPAM?}  Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,
 Eliminate  all licensing - Indiana

There wouldn't be any laws against mma. If there is no law/rules,  
nothing can be done.  diana from indiana


Quoting [email protected]:

> Query:
> As we know MMA shows its ugly head occasionally at some unmentionable salons.
>
> In the absence of licenses (no suspension) how would these  
> defaulters be penalized?
>
> G
>
> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marsha Rubino <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:33:09
> To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, Eliminate  all
>  licensing - Indiana
>
> I think I understand where you stand on the licensing issue,  
> Maggie and, although I agree, I'm not sure what would happen if  
> there weren't licensing. Schools could still operate and continue  
> training. But, since there would be no licensing, they wouldn't have  
> to teach to the test. hmmmm... Licensing may not affect  
> manufacturers and what they chose to design and produce. Doug Schoon  
> could continue to educate using his scientific research and  
> information. Does licensing really promote safety and the informed  
> usage of materials and equipment? Perhaps but we (nail techs) sure  
> see plenty of damage done by licensed individuals. It does make a  
> person stop and weigh the evidence. AND YEAH, why retain some  
> licensing and not others??
>
>
> Marsha
>
> From: Maggie in Visalia <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,  
>> Eliminate all licensing - Indiana
>>
>>
>> how do they propose to do away with cosmo licensing while retaining  
>> mani and esthi licensing? Will that mean you won't need a license  
>> to do hair, but if you HAD a cosmo license you'll have to GO BACK  
>> and get a mani and/or esthi license to continue to legally perform  
>> those services? Or does IN actually seperate hair/nails/skin so  
>> cosmos can't perfrom ALL services, just hair?
>>  
>> Y'all might be aware that I am total Devil's Advocate on this  
>> issue-- I think licensing is a waste of tax payers' money-- but it  
>> doesn't make sense to keep some licenses and not others.
>>
>> Maggie Franklin:
>> Owner & Artist, The Art of Nailz, Visalia CA
>>  "Visionary rebel dreamer; obviously way ahead of my time."
>> Maggie Rants [and Raves]@Nails Magazine 
>> Facebook
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Debbie Doerrlamm <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:25 AM
>>> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,  
>>> Eliminate all licensing - Indiana
>>>
>>>
>>> Wendy, read closer..  it says IF the legislation is NOT passed -  
>>> the board NOT eliminated - the manicurist and esthetician licenses  
>>> will not be changed.. they said if  the bill passed, the entire  
>>> board would be dissolved and let the buyer beware.. if it fails  
>>> and the board is retained, there will be changes to the school,  
>>> educator, cosmo, barber and other licenses, but NOT nails and  
>>> este's..
>>>
>>> so many double negatives its very confusing..
>>> pass this bill - board and ALL licensing goes bye-bye
>>> fail the bill - many changes but not to the nail or esthetician license
>>>
>>>
>>> At 09:54 AM 1/11/2012, you wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh Diana, How discouraging!
>>>> It seems as though they will keep Manicurists and Estheticians
>>>> licensed, which is good.
>>>> It may not pass or pass with modifications
>>>> I feel your pain! I am surprised they didn't use CT as a shining
>>>> example of how licensing is not needed. ( I, too, am being facetious!)
>>>> I'll help spread the word.
>>>> Wendy CT [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 10, 7:52 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> Well it happened.  As of yesterday, to eliminate all Cosmetology and
>>>>> Barber licensing  is now up for a vote in the House and Senate.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that there will be no licensing, no schools, no regulation.
>>>>>    The schooling and license you have now will mean nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that anyone off the street can do hair, nails, tanning,
>>>>> waxing, anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea how this will be handled by the supply houses, because
>>>>> they only sell to those that are licensed.  All new ball game for all
>>>>> manufacturers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the website that contains the full ROEC report:   
>>>>> http://www.in.gov/pla/files/Regulated_Occupations_Recommendations_Rep  
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course with any proposed legislation, licensees may also contact
>>>>> their Legislator athttp://www.in.gov/legislative/index.htm.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ROEC committee basically says that if the consumer is hurt, they
>>>>> can hire an attorney, if they get a bad hair cut, they can switch to
>>>>> another salon, buyer beware.  But Government regulation is not needed.
>>>>>    Please read the report.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for all of the non Indiana techs on here, If one state does this,
>>>>> others will follow.
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot lobby for or against this because I work for the Governor.
>>>>> My advice is if you agree or disagree, contact your local
>>>>> representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot contact everyone, can you please pass the word in your salons.
>>>>>
>>>>> Diana Bonn - Indiana State Board of Cosmetology - (diana from indiana)
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>> Google Groups "NailTech" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at  
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Debbie  ^v^  ^o^  //\o/\\ ^o^  ^v^  Webmaster - System Admin
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>> (AIM - NailGdsss, GTalk wkdwich p-631-213-1843)
>>> Ronkonkoma, NY & Rocky Mount, VA
>>> ONLINE STORE http://www.beautytech.com/shoppe
>>>
>>> www.beautytech.com   for Professionals           
>>> www.beautytech.INFO  for Consumers
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>>> Groups "NailTech" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at  
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups "NailTech" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at  
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "NailTech" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at  
> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "NailTech" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at  
> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

Reply via email to