It seems a bit silly for schools to remain open if there's no licensing , why would I wast time and money in school, I would just take and educational class from oh I don't know cnd , Tammy Taylor, any where they would take mY money ( manufacturers repeatedly push there professional products to the public after we the manicurist make it popular)
And I don't believe mma is always the issue I worked for a while in one of them salons at the front of Meijers ( regal nails) where pedi gloves were re-used by turning them inside-out and then powdered . Something as basic as not cleaning your salon equipment from new orange wood sticks for each client to not washing down your table can spread many fungus and viruses . Kelley Marie Sent from me. On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Thx diana. Much appreciated. > > I guess its "buyer beware". Customers will have to research and hope they > never end up in a nail salon with compromised product ethics. > > > Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:08:01 > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: {SPAM?} Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, > Eliminate all licensing - Indiana > > There wouldn't be any laws against mma. If there is no law/rules, > nothing can be done. diana from indiana > > > Quoting [email protected]: > >> Query: >> As we know MMA shows its ugly head occasionally at some unmentionable salons. >> >> In the absence of licenses (no suspension) how would these >> defaulters be penalized? >> >> G >> >> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marsha Rubino <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:33:09 >> To: [email protected]<[email protected]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, Eliminate all >> licensing - Indiana >> >> I think I understand where you stand on the licensing issue, >> Maggie and, although I agree, I'm not sure what would happen if >> there weren't licensing. Schools could still operate and continue >> training. But, since there would be no licensing, they wouldn't have >> to teach to the test. hmmmm... Licensing may not affect >> manufacturers and what they chose to design and produce. Doug Schoon >> could continue to educate using his scientific research and >> information. Does licensing really promote safety and the informed >> usage of materials and equipment? Perhaps but we (nail techs) sure >> see plenty of damage done by licensed individuals. It does make a >> person stop and weigh the evidence. AND YEAH, why retain some >> licensing and not others?? >> >> >> Marsha >> >> From: Maggie in Visalia <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:42 PM >>> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, >>> Eliminate all licensing - Indiana >>> >>> >>> how do they propose to do away with cosmo licensing while retaining >>> mani and esthi licensing? Will that mean you won't need a license >>> to do hair, but if you HAD a cosmo license you'll have to GO BACK >>> and get a mani and/or esthi license to continue to legally perform >>> those services? Or does IN actually seperate hair/nails/skin so >>> cosmos can't perfrom ALL services, just hair? >>> >>> Y'all might be aware that I am total Devil's Advocate on this >>> issue-- I think licensing is a waste of tax payers' money-- but it >>> doesn't make sense to keep some licenses and not others. >>> >>> Maggie Franklin: >>> Owner & Artist, The Art of Nailz, Visalia CA >>> "Visionary rebel dreamer; obviously way ahead of my time." >>> Maggie Rants [and Raves]@Nails Magazine >>> Facebook >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Debbie Doerrlamm <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:25 AM >>>> Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, >>>> Eliminate all licensing - Indiana >>>> >>>> >>>> Wendy, read closer.. it says IF the legislation is NOT passed - >>>> the board NOT eliminated - the manicurist and esthetician licenses >>>> will not be changed.. they said if the bill passed, the entire >>>> board would be dissolved and let the buyer beware.. if it fails >>>> and the board is retained, there will be changes to the school, >>>> educator, cosmo, barber and other licenses, but NOT nails and >>>> este's.. >>>> >>>> so many double negatives its very confusing.. >>>> pass this bill - board and ALL licensing goes bye-bye >>>> fail the bill - many changes but not to the nail or esthetician license >>>> >>>> >>>> At 09:54 AM 1/11/2012, you wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh Diana, How discouraging! >>>>> It seems as though they will keep Manicurists and Estheticians >>>>> licensed, which is good. >>>>> It may not pass or pass with modifications >>>>> I feel your pain! I am surprised they didn't use CT as a shining >>>>> example of how licensing is not needed. ( I, too, am being facetious!) >>>>> I'll help spread the word. >>>>> Wendy CT [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 10, 7:52 pm, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> Well it happened. As of yesterday, to eliminate all Cosmetology and >>>>>> Barber licensing is now up for a vote in the House and Senate. >>>>>> >>>>>> This means that there will be no licensing, no schools, no regulation. >>>>>> The schooling and license you have now will mean nothing. >>>>>> >>>>>> This means that anyone off the street can do hair, nails, tanning, >>>>>> waxing, anything. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no idea how this will be handled by the supply houses, because >>>>>> they only sell to those that are licensed. All new ball game for all >>>>>> manufacturers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the website that contains the full ROEC report: >>>>>> http://www.in.gov/pla/files/Regulated_Occupations_Recommendations_Rep >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course with any proposed legislation, licensees may also contact >>>>>> their Legislator athttp://www.in.gov/legislative/index.htm. >>>>>> >>>>>> The ROEC committee basically says that if the consumer is hurt, they >>>>>> can hire an attorney, if they get a bad hair cut, they can switch to >>>>>> another salon, buyer beware. But Government regulation is not needed. >>>>>> Please read the report. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for all of the non Indiana techs on here, If one state does this, >>>>>> others will follow. >>>>>> >>>>>> I cannot lobby for or against this because I work for the Governor. >>>>>> My advice is if you agree or disagree, contact your local >>>>>> representative. >>>>>> >>>>>> I cannot contact everyone, can you please pass the word in your salons. >>>>>> >>>>>> Diana Bonn - Indiana State Board of Cosmetology - (diana from indiana) >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>> Google Groups "NailTech" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Debbie ^v^ ^o^ //\o/\\ ^o^ ^v^ Webmaster - System Admin >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> (AIM - NailGdsss, GTalk wkdwich p-631-213-1843) >>>> Ronkonkoma, NY & Rocky Mount, VA >>>> ONLINE STORE http://www.beautytech.com/shoppe >>>> >>>> www.beautytech.com for Professionals >>>> www.beautytech.INFO for Consumers >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "NailTech" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "NailTech" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "NailTech" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "NailTech" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. >> >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NailTech" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NailTech" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NailTech" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
