Hi Renee,

I'm all for sharing ideas, insights, inspirations... I was objecting to willful 
obfuscation... What ideas are are evolving here?...

"the avatartist are all space, all time, visible, invisible,
 transparent,
translucent, of here and there opaque, they murmur we are all
 avatartist,
are of saying nothing, whispering nothing, murmuring nothing, all in
 the
true world. the avatartist are writing this, us, them, there, here,
 now,
then, they are writing this-us-them-there-here-now-then, they are
 writing
and writing, they are writing nothing...."

I believe this is solipsism run riot... always ending up its own arse.... How 
about an effort at clarity, simplicity and beauty?... the qualities of the best 
ideas in art, science, philosophy etc?...

Bob


----- Original Message ----
From: Renee Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October, 2007 8:33:29 AM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] no

Hi Alan,

I also appreciate your posts and watching your ideas evolve.  So, as  
far as I'm concerned, keep them coming.

One of the things I like about this list is that people can present  
things in process.  To me, it's the very spirit of netbehaviour :-)

best,

Renee
www.geuzen.org
On 15 Oct 2007, at 15:55, Alan Sondheim wrote:

>
>
> no it's not bullshit; I'm working through ontologies and  
> epistemologies of
> avatars/the virtual, using both formal topology and Buddhist  
> philosophy,
> specifically several works by Nagarjuna as well as the  
> Hevajratantra and
> Visuddhimaggha. Terms like the true world reference emptiness and the
> absence of worlding, 'gathering' references aggregrates, and
 filtering
> comes from things I've written before on inscription. Since you've  
> called
> it bullshit, I really don't want to engage in a debate about its  
> merits
> and if Marc wants I'll desist here, but from my end (and for that  
> matter
> the reading of other people I respect) I'm on to something and want
 to
> follow it through; certainly it's relevant literally to netbehaviour.
>
> - Alan
>
>
 ====================================================================== 
> =
> Work on YouTube, blog at http://nikuko.blogspot.com . Tel  
> 718-813-3285.
> Webpage directory http://www.asondheim.org . Email:  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://clc.as.wvu.edu:8080/clc/Members/sondheim for theory; also
 check
> WVU Zwiki, Google for recent. Write for info on books, cds,  
> performance,
> dvds, etc.  
> =============================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour






      ___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to