i am on to something
Positivity
it is on me
Positivity
DOLPHINS,
COCONUTS TREES, MY HEAD IN POSITIVITY
I went to the mayor
my inscription is not ready
it will take more 2 weeks
POSITIVITY
have no money on the bank
the check someone gave is out of funds
i have no proeminent job
not even a job
POSITIVITY
the sun shines
as hell more than ever
to live near the equator line is not the same as ten years ago
my skin now burns at 8 in the morning
POSITIVITY
i walk on shadows
and get new names from it
none recognizes me anymore
POSITIVITY
i take the coconut, brake on the rock, take the water
and wash the face. there is nothing more than salt
POSITIVITY
i don't have how to pay the electricity line this month
but i never had at all
so,

POSITIVITY

Em Quarta 17 Outubro 2007 22:40, Dion Laurent escreveu:
> I'm on to something
> BULLSHIT
> they are on to me!
> BULLSHIT
> I'm on to something
> MAD COW
> AVATAR, MY FOOT IN BULLSHIT,
> My cow died,
> the fucking red ants,
> what is that for holy, fuckin' cow
> have you seen the holiness of a red ant,
> talk about at one, fucking meal of meat, buzzards alike
> thank krishna for the wolf, the coyote, what should they eat,
> rabbit, carrot, juice
> a scorpion on the soul of crickets, cricket ranch,
> what a place, vishnu professes, I am one, one owl,
> we hear your whoot, hoot, whoooooo, who , how lovely,
> whispering whoots from the dry creek, arroyo
> the cats killed another fucking frog
> how can I believe you're disease, your unease, your face, your faith,
> your impossible place in believe(ing)
> 5000 years or so ago, 3000 thousand, sounds of past, I would rather fast,
> starve, bake in the heat of my avatar, oil money war bar(code) every(thing)
> and sell it as my face, my face, our faith, oh bullshit, the holy cow, the
> red ants, the bones, the boneyard, my cow dies, ghost, leaving behind
> moses, and the red ants, the fire ants, the faith, the faithlessness, who
> the fuck are you, avatar, oh great one, where the fuck is my dead cow and
> who the hell are the red ants that ate his meat
> I'm on to something
> eating red fire ants
> crickets
> creak
> creek
> click
>
>
>
>
> Dion Laurent
> http://www.dionlaurent.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Szpakowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] no
>
> > Ho-hum -we've been here before- a lot- with similar
> > 'discussions' of Alan's work.
> > How much of Alan's work have you seen Bob? Do you have
> > any idea of the context of his work? Did you even
> > attempt get some sort of wider picture of what he does
> > before you attacked him on the basis of a single
> > piece?
> > I understand that it is in the nature of a discussion
> > list that people come to it afresh, that work is
> > posted without any obvious signposts or easy context
> > but that does place a  responsibility on the critic to
> > *inform* themselves before rushing into judgement.
> > If you'd cited, perhaps, a couple of Alan's movies,
> > some of his music/sound work, some of the poetry ( or
> > even given some indication that you'd *bothered* to
> > find out that a *body* of widely varying work exists &
> > that some of the admitted peculiarities of the piece
> > you attacked could begin to be understood against that
> > background) & *then* made a reasoned case for why it's
> > somehow unworthy then I might have disagreed but you'd
> > have fulfilled your responsibilites as an commentator
> > & we'd have a starting point for a genuine discussion.
> > michael
> >
> > --- bob catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Karen,
> >>
> >> "Total subjectivity" is the unavoidable condition of
> >> babies... I find in an adult, the relentless spew is
> >> obnoxious egoism... James Joyce seemed to have done
> >> the subjective voice so much better 90 years ago...
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: karen blissett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed
> >> creativity <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2007 2:08:23 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] no
> >>
> >> >I believe this is solipsism run riot... always
> >>
> >> ending up its own arse.... How about an effort at
> >> clarity, simplicity and beauty?... the qualities of
> >> the best ideas in art, science, philosophy etc?...
> >>
> >> Aha,
> >>
> >>
> >> Are you asking Alan to ignore his subjective voice,
> >> mutate away into a realm of modernist invisibility.
> >> A sliding from personal and intuitive politick to a
> >> static non-fluid essence of accepted poise.
> >>
> >> His language and functions antagonise the ideals and
> >> pedagogical, crumbly mono-theisms that choke us into
> >> accepting the norm.
> >>
> >>
> >> Perhaps his voice is performance, a noise that
> >> thrives on the energy of being, this perpetual state
> >> of being is irrational, illogical and engulfed in
> >> total subjectivity.
> >>
> >> Surely total subjectivity is a form simplicity in
> >> its own right and therefore a kin to beauty, thus
> >> flouting the lies of science with impunity and
> >> simultaneously freeing the voice and mind from the
> >> bondage of unreality or our presumed realities.
> >>
> >>
> >> Formal concerns are not in any way pure, purity is
> >> imaginary, transparent and subjective, as is beauty.
> >>
> >> In a previous life, Plato believed that he had been
> >> a bush. Pythagoras saw a similarity between the
> >> substance of his brain and his own semen. As far as
> >> I a concerned, how Alan expounds his noise is his
> >> own business and creative choice.
> >>
> >>
> >> I may not always agree with the content but I do
> >> agree with the context :-)
> >>
> >> karen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/16/07, bob catchpole <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi Renee,
> >>
> >> I'm all for sharing ideas, insights, inspirations...
> >> I was objecting to willful obfuscation... What ideas
> >> are are evolving here?...
> >>
> >>
> >> "the avatartist are all space, all time, visible,
> >> invisible,
> >>  transparent,
> >> translucent, of here and there opaque, they murmur
> >> we are all
> >>  avatartist,
> >> are of saying nothing, whispering nothing, murmuring
> >> nothing, all in
> >>  the
> >> true world. the avatartist are writing this, us,
> >> them, there, here,
> >>  now,
> >> then, they are writing
> >> this-us-them-there-here-now-then, they are
> >>  writing
> >> and writing, they are writing nothing...."
> >>
> >> I believe this is solipsism run riot... always
> >> ending up its own arse.... How about an effort at
> >> clarity, simplicity and beauty?... the qualities of
> >> the best ideas in art, science, philosophy etc?...
> >>
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Renee Turner <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed
> >> creativity <[email protected]
> >>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 16 October, 2007 8:33:29 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] no
> >>
> >> Hi Alan,
> >>
> >> I also appreciate your posts and watching your ideas
> >> evolve.  So, as
> >> far as I'm concerned, keep them coming.
> >>
> >>
> >> One of the things I like about this list is that
> >> people can present
> >> things in process.  To me, it's the very spirit of
> >> netbehaviour :-)
> >>
> >> best,
> >>
> >> Renee
> >>
> >> www.geuzen.org
> >>
> >> On 15 Oct 2007, at 15:55, Alan Sondheim wrote:
> >> > no it's not bullshit; I'm working through
> >>
> >> ontologies and
> >>
> >> > epistemologies of
> >> > avatars/the virtual, using both formal topology
> >>
> >> and Buddhist
> >>
> >> > philosophy,
> >> > specifically several works by Nagarjuna as well as
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >> > Hevajratantra and
> >> > Visuddhimaggha. Terms like the true world
> >>
> >> reference emptiness and the
> >>
> >> > absence of worlding, 'gathering' references
> >>
> >> aggregrates, and
> >>  filtering
> >>
> >> > comes from things I've written before on
> >>
> >> inscription. Since you've
> >>
> >> > called
> >> > it bullshit, I really don't want to engage in a
> >>
> >> debate about its
> >>
> >> > merits
> >> > and if Marc wants I'll desist here, but from my
> >>
> >> end (and for that
> >>
> >> > matter
> >> > the reading of other people I respect) I'm on to
> >>
> >> something and want
> >>  to
> >>
> >> > follow it through; certainly it's relevant
> >>
> >> literally to netbehaviour.
> >>
> >> > - Alan
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to