I absolutely agree that this is more interesting than the Mandiberg, and for
much the same reasons. Certainly there's a wild unpredictability to the ceding
of something so personal as an e mail address which in terms of *real*
consequences might play out much more creatively than the actually rather
measured, prescriptive & essentially conservative feel of the MM piece.
(There always seemed to be a continual *desperation* with him to be on top of
the next new thing, even when the result in art terms was not all that
interesting.
However he was a good egg in that he voluntarily gave his time to running an
excellent calls and opps list for several years & for that I am grateful...)
cheers
michael
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Ruth Catlow <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
<[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 5:46 PM
Great stuff so far Karen(s) and Marc and Michael and Alan,
It seems to me Karen that you are likely to be closer to nn than to "the
essential guide to mandiberg"...
more anarcho-cyborg than the bureaucractic-art-twonk that is the over-surveyed
subject of mandiberg's alter-ego; )
I think that's something to do with that fact that you are inviting people to
join you by opening up your email.
It is not "about" being multiple.
It "is" being multiple.
You have already told us a bit about your celebrity art parents.
Do you feel that you are following in their footsteps?
Why have you issued this invitation to join you now? And why by email when
everyone is so busy socialising in sites like Facebook and Twitter?
Cheers
Ruth
-----Original Message-----
From: karen blissett <[email protected]>
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:37:15 +0100
So...yes please Ruth
perhaps the interview has already started.
:)
Karen
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ruth Catlow <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Karen,
What an intriguing idea brimming with subversive potential; )
I would like to join you.
But before I "speak and act as you" I would like to "speak to you" to find out
more about you and why you have decided to to do this.
How would you feel about a short interview here in the Netbehaviour list?
very best things
Ruth
-----Original Message-----
From: karen blissett <[email protected]>
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:43:24 +0100
Dear Friends.
Please join me.
Literally.
I want to become more open and free, with a more distributed identity.
So if you would like to take a break from yourself and speak and act as me
instead, please drop me a personal email.
If I trust you I will send you my password and you can start expressing me.
Can't wait!
Karen Blissett
--
Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
--
Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
