hi helen, i'm not dismissing your comments at all, i'm simply responding directly to simon. in terms of your opinion that my actions accelerated syndicate's decline, I respectfully disagree. if you have any qs or would like my direct opinion, pls don't hesitate to ask [here or back-channel].
chunks, @netwurker On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Helen Sloan <[email protected]> wrote: > Well > > Netwurker and others, I am rather offended that you dismiss my comments. > As I’ve said, don’t implode. At this point, it’s a bad idea. > > As for the filters comment, we all discussed it – you even gave > instructions, but you accelerated a cultural death to the Syndicate that was > unfair. > > You will probably respond to Simon rather than me – we were around at the > same time and still operate. What is that all about? > > Helen > > > > On 12/7/10 00:08, "mez breeze" <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...having been 1 of the celebrated "spam artists" back in the days of > Integer>NN, it was a [relatively easy] option then [as it is now] 2 set up > filters/blocks in regards 2 material list users find > objectionable/overloading. i do agree, simon, that it might b deemed > arrogant to deluge ppl with mammoth data hits: i think to associate this > with the 7-11 list outpourings we did back in the late 90's is misleading. > the art lists we "spam"/net.artists utilized knew full-well about our art > practices + most encouraged it. context, content + the mechanisms of > exclusion should b examined here as well as allusions 2 data-deluges;) > > chunks, > @netwurker > > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > -- Reality Engineer> Synthetic Environment Strategist> Game[r + ] Theorist. ::http://unhub.com/netwurker ::
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
