Very very interesting that this has been commented on so much.
I suspect the reason is that this is a web based forum with contributers who have some stake in new media ie freakin boring computers (I say this as a one time street artist and latecomer to computers) and so when somebody picks up a paint brush it's like woo hoo how exotic. Personally I still find the idea of programming a computer incredibly boring - however I give you guys some slack and say cool if you want to make code into poetry. To me a machine is merely an end to a means, in this case artistic expression. Lets all paint paint paint - make a big bonfire of cameras - they were always a con ;)

Simon
On 15 Jan 2012, at 16:27, bob catchpole wrote:

Michael,

I disagree with John Baldessari. Painting and photography are radically different picture-making processes - one is based on synthesis and the other on selection. In a painting or drawing you start with nothing and have to add. In photography you start with everything and have to extract.

Your drawing are strong because they capture something about you.

Bob

From: Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, 15 January 2012, 15:11
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] fail better

Once again thanks for the interesting, helpful and encouraging responses. I feel strangely the same when I point my camera at something and when I do a sketch "in the moment" - I'm quite impressed by Patrick Maynard's argument which seems to be that drawing and photography are essentially both just processes of mark making.... I think I could quite quickly produce you a photo of a unicorn actually - I'm deeply sceptical about all the indexical , one-one correspondence to reality - blather about photos. It was pretty much never the defining feature ( ask Joe Stalin) and it certainly isn't now. Moreover I'm not convinced that when I draw I'm any less a "mechanism" of some kind for creating a kind of map of at least some parts of reality than I am when I photograph (or remix photos which is something I've been doing a lot). I'm with Baldessari who scratched his head ( I'm dramatising of course and quoting from memory here) and said he couldn't really see that much difference between painting and photographs... Anyway, theory aside, that I should get such kind and helpful feedback is one of the reasons I love netbehaviour :)
warm wishes
michael

OK -just found it:
John Baldessari : “A photograph and a painting are essentially the same thing. One is just a series of pigments in emulsifier put down on canvas, while the other is silver nitrate deposits put down on paper. There is very little difference between the two.”


From: Perry Bard <[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] fail better


Last night a philosopher friend Nick Pappas and I had this very conversation-about the properties of photo vs painting and drawing. WJT Mitchell in Intention and Artifice isolates an essential difference- the referent adheres in a photo- you can paint a unicorn but not photograph one (irrefutable, no?). Nick argued that a camera is an object- you point and record, even if you make a mistake or someone jostles your hand you record a specific moment in time whereas a drawing records a moment in consciousness.
Perry

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Annie Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: I do think Michael you have a lot of formal technique - the way you chose, frame and compose the image, the way you look at things is very "sophisticated". I was wondering what for you makes these drawings so different from your photos? Why do you want to do it? Is it a question of time? of attention?of meditation? of trying to grasp something in a world too full of information?
For me your drawings are full of time and
they are brave
I love to see them.
Annie


On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
On 14/01/12 17:00, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
> thank-you Joel...
> I don't honestly know how I expect people to react. I'm pretty obsessed
> at the moment...
> I know that drawing is something I really want to keep doing.
> warm wishes
> michael

You have a good eye for form, space and tone. As someone who's an
enthusiastic rather than a competent draughtsperson I really admire what
you are doing here. Do keep doing!

- Rob.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



--

Extrait en photo et son de la performance HUIS-CLOS / NO EXIT Training for a Better World
http://www.documentary-art.net/tag/watch-now.php?&ref=344
Plus de photos : http://www.flickr.com/photos/bramorg/sets/ 72157628514083331/

"Die Ewigkeit/ L'éternité", Antye GREIE / Annie ABRAHAMS - DUET - SATZ 4 - Rêves / Utopia / Dreams http://vimeo.com/33907750
http://www.bram.org


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



--
www.perrybard.net
http://dziga.perrybard.net

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to