On 02/05/09 11:37, Sunay Tripathi wrote: > Peter Memishian wrote: > >> > > I'd find it more dynamic and fair to have each of the core >> > > contributors >> > > above send out their list of proposed core contributors (which will >> > > likely >> > > overlap but not be identical to the list above), then have someone >> > > aggregate the proposals and grant core contributor status to everyone >> > > getting 3 or more "+1" votes. This is roughly what the tools >> > > community >> > > did and it seemed effective. >> > >> > Of course, if some of the core contributors want to do this it's fine >> > too, we can keep track of the nominations and compile the list. If a >> > core contributor is happy with the list above they can also second it. >> >> Sounds good. Here's my nomination list (alphabetic by last name): >> >> James Carlson >> Eric Cheng >> Renee Danson >> Nicolas Droux >> Erik Nordmark >> Sebastien Roy >> Thirumalai Srinivasan >> Sunay Tripathi >> Sowmini Varadhan >> Cathy Zhou >> What is the criteria for a Solaris Networking engineer to be selected as a Opensolaris contributor/core contributer( given there is no Solaris branch and all projects in Networking are being done as part of Opensolaris.) ? What is the difference between a contributer and a core contributer?
Sangeeta _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
