There's no laws against ANY party not knowing in Idaho. Record away..
________________________________ From: Kyle Munz <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 9:06:02 AM Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist Same in TX. As long as one party to a conversation is aware that it's being recorded that's sufficient. If neither party to the conversation are aware then it's wire tapping. -Kyle On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Kim Paddock <[email protected]> wrote: The nice thing about Idaho...you don't have to inform anyone that you're recording them. > > > > ________________________________ From: stanley/ Randolph <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] >Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 9:28:59 PM > >Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist > > > >I also have a friend who was a cop - a Black cop. He is now selling insurance >and told me this story one time: he would not let his daughter drive from the >east coast from school, because of the rep of the local cops. He went to pick >her up and they were stopped and they wanted to inspect his trunk and back >seat, >and he had a recorder going and refused to turn it off. They asked him to and >he refused and told them he was an ex cop and point blank that he didn't trust >them. He then invted them to proceed with their inspection, but that they >could >expect him to use his tape to defend himself if they planted anything in his >car >to arrest him. >They backed off and left him alone. >It's best to record in self-defense these days because one never knows. If >they >can, we the people can. > > > > > > > ________________________________ From: Kim Paddock <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 8:34:02 PM >Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist > > > He never denied that he was in the wrong. He paid the ticket and all. The >real question was: does anyone expect to have a privacy status while in the >public? Why can they record everyone else and we can't record them? They're >probably still pissed about the Rodney King thing. The cops got busted up in >their crap for that one and riots ensued. > In a world full of cameras and recording devices of all kinds, including >satellites which can record ANYTHING it seems I don't think that any human >being >in their right mind would think that a public place is free from these >devices. >Add to that the fact that this fella had the dang thing clearly on top of his >helmet in clear view of the officer. The officer was aware that he was being >recorded and that's the crux of the matter. Now the cops claim "fowl" since >the >video was put out there and this cop now claims to not know that the camera >was >there right in front of his face? Please! It's just that the Gang in Blue are >all pissy and had to go take all of the guy's stuff away and try to prosecute >him. It won't happen. This case will end up being an embarrasment for the cops. > > > > ________________________________ From: surfswab <[email protected]> >To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]> >Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 6:09:23 AM >Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist > >Afraid I have a different take on this: > >Unlike most crotch rocketeers who terrorize the motoring public with >their high-speed foolishness, the dumbass got caught. Now wants to >mitigate by turning his illegal behavior on the cop by claiming victim >status. > >That's bullsh*t. > >In my view, the cop did what he was supposed to -- he put a stop to it >before somebody got hurt, plain clothes, no badge...whatever. If I'd >been the perp I woulda destroyed my own tape to avoid the embarassment >of my stupidity becoming even more public than it already was. > > > > > > > >On Jul 21, 10:19 pm, Stumpi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Awesome on that first one I'd have sued that guy and state from the >> get go. As pullover stories go, I think this one is my >>favoritehttp://lifeisaroad.com/stories/2005/11/16/everybodysACritic.html > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en. > > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en. > > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en. > > > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
