Same in TX. As long as one party to a conversation is aware that it's being
recorded that's sufficient. If neither party to the conversation are aware
then it's wire tapping.

-Kyle


On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Kim Paddock <[email protected]> wrote:

> The nice thing about Idaho...you don't have to inform anyone that you're
> recording them.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* stanley/ Randolph <[email protected]>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thu, July 22, 2010 9:28:59 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist
>
>  I also have a friend who was a cop - a Black cop.  He is now selling
> insurance and told me this story one time:  he would not let his daughter
> drive from the east coast from school, because of the rep of the local
> cops.  He went to pick her up and they were stopped and they wanted to
> inspect his trunk and back seat, and he had a recorder going and refused to
> turn it off.  They asked him to and he refused and told them he was an ex
> cop and point blank that he didn't trust them.  He then invted them to
> proceed with their inspection, but that they could expect him to use his
> tape to defend himself if they planted anything in his car to arrest him.
> They backed off and left him alone.
> It's best to record in self-defense these days because one never knows.  If
> they can, we the people can.
>
> **
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Kim Paddock <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thu, July 22, 2010 8:34:02 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist
>
>      He never denied that he was in the wrong. He paid the ticket and all.
> The real question was: does anyone expect to have a privacy status while in
> the public? Why can they record everyone else and we can't record them?
> They're probably still pissed about the Rodney King thing. The cops got
> busted up in their crap for that one and riots ensued.
>     In a world full of cameras and recording devices of all kinds,
> including satellites which can record ANYTHING it seems I don't think that
> any human being in their right mind would think that a public place is free
> from these devices. Add to that the fact that this fella had the dang thing
> clearly on top of his helmet in clear view of the officer. The officer was
> aware that he was being recorded and that's the crux of the matter. Now the
> cops claim "fowl" since the video was put out there and this cop now claims
> to not know that the camera was there right in front of his face? Please!
> It's just that the Gang in Blue are all pissy and had to go take all of the
> guy's stuff away and try to prosecute him. It won't happen. This case will
> end up being an embarrasment for the cops.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* surfswab <[email protected]>
> *To:* Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thu, July 22, 2010 6:09:23 AM
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Cop Pulls Out Gun On Motorcyclist
>
> Afraid I have a different take on this:
>
> Unlike most crotch rocketeers who terrorize the motoring public with
> their high-speed foolishness, the dumbass got caught.  Now wants to
> mitigate by turning his illegal behavior on the cop by claiming victim
> status.
>
> That's bullsh*t.
>
> In my view, the cop did what he was supposed to -- he put a stop to it
> before somebody got hurt, plain clothes, no badge...whatever.  If I'd
> been the perp I woulda destroyed my own tape to avoid the embarassment
> of my stupidity becoming even more public than it already was.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 10:19 pm, Stumpi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Awesome on that first one I'd have sued that guy and state from the
> > get go.  As pullover stories go, I think this one is my favorite
> http://lifeisaroad.com/stories/2005/11/16/everybodysACritic.html
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nighthawk_lovers+
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nighthawk_lovers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nighthawk_lovers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nighthawk_lovers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to