A plain clothes in his personally owned vehicle (MD unmarked cars
still have lights\sirens) shouldn't have gotten involved in the first
place. There was a marked unit there. If when he pulled in front of
that guy he made the biker crash, then the cop would have been liable.
Stupid on the cops part.

On 7/23/10, Kyle Munz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with everything you say, especially about the rider, but I have to
> disagree on one point. The cop had a requirement to identify himself as an
> officer. This needs to be done before or at the same time as his firearm is
> pulled, ESPECIALLY if he's unmarked. We're assuming he's a plainclothes cop
> in an unmarked car. I personally think he was an off-duty cop in his
> personal vehicle. If you pull a gun on me without identifying yourself,
> especially after the way he whipped his car around the bike, I'm going to
> run. Pull up beside me, roll your window down, and say "Hey buddy, I'm a
> cop, and you're busted" and I'll just slide over to the shoulder.
> We're not arguing that the biker was wrong, that he should have been
> stopped, the cop went over the top in his methods however.
>
> -Kyle
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:50 AM, surfswab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've yet to read a convincing argument that the cop was in the wrong.
>>
>> He witnessed life-threatening behavior and he stopped it.  That's
>> what  he's sworn to do.  Having his firearm at the ready was a wise
>> precaution in case the guy got squirrely.
>>
>> No telling what mental state the biker was in coming down from the
>> adrenelin rush of triple-digit speeds and high-risk behavior.  He
>> might have tried to run over the cop and take off again, which would
>> have compounded the problem.  And I'm sure the cop was thinking just
>> that.
>>
>> This wasn't just your ordinary traffic stop.  The biker had already
>> demonstrated the willingness and intention to put himself and others
>> at risk.
>>
>> He was a menace -- and the cop did the right thing.
>>
>> All the rest of it is pure political posturing.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<nighthawk_lovers%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to