Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences]

[Dan Harkless]

Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Well, anno might be implementable via the IMAP "tags" facility, no?
> 
> Are you thinking about "flags"?  

Yeah, sorry -- I'm just picking up the terminology from this discussion.

> I don't think they're rich enough to
> emulate everything that annotations give you.  

Because you can't add multiple ones per message, or because they're of a
fixed length, or...?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless                   | To prevent SPAM contamination, please 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW.  Thank you.