notifications  

Messages by Thread

• [I] UDF editor window doesn’t reposition/resize on browser window resize (close “X” can go off-screen) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UDF editor window doesn’t reposition/resize on browser window resize (close “X” can go off-screen) [texera] via GitHub
• [I] “Add port” (+) becomes hard to click when an operator has ≥3 ports [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] “Add port” (+) becomes hard to click when an operator has ≥3 ports [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Mini map still shows Region highlighting when “Regions” is turned off [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Mini map still shows Region highlighting when “Regions” is turned off [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Mini map still shows Region highlighting when “Regions” is turned off [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Mini map still shows Region highlighting when “Regions” is turned off [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Mini map still shows Region highlighting when “Regions” is turned off [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Improving frontend highlighting of regions [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improving frontend highlighting of regions [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improving frontend highlighting of regions [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improving frontend highlighting of regions [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ui): clean up upload section and replace contact info image with text [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ui): clean up upload section and replace contact info image with text [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ui): clean up upload section and replace contact info image with text [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ui): clean up upload section [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ui): clean up upload section by removing newlines between "upload" and "or" [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(core): unify type ops and reuse in sort/agg [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add Chat Assistant Service as a New Micro-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Chat Assistant Service as a New Micro-service [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(scatterplot): avoid malformed Python when optionals are absent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(scatterplot): avoid malformed Python when optionals are absent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(scatterplot): avoid malformed Python when optionals are absent [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Scatterplot implementation SyntaxError when X log scale is enabled [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Scatterplot implementation SyntaxError when X log scale is enabled [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Driver Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Add Separate Amber Worker Container in the Computing-Unit Pod and Route All UDFs There [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LLM agents as the Texera workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: introduce the LLM-based workflow copilot [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Remove `restart: always` from LakeFS Docker Compose [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove `restart: always` from LakeFS Docker Compose [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update paths in contributing guide [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(gui): enforce cursor to be pointer type when hovering over resources [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Revisit the early decision regarding "Remove unused RPCs and disable reconfiguration" [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Sort operator acting weird when doing editing [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Some Boolean Attributes for Operators does not have Default Value [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Some Boolean Attributes for Operators does not have Default Value [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support in sort operator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support in sort operator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support in sort operator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort): add BINARY type support in sort operator [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Allow Binary Sorting [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow sorting on binary attributes [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] write a Security Model document [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] write a Security Model document [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] write a Security Model document [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] write a Security Model document [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: upgrade postgresql jars due to CVEs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: upgrade postgresql jars due to CVEs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: upgrade postgresql jars due to CVEs [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ingress-paths): replace regex with wildcard [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(helm-chart): replace regex with wildcard in the ingress rules [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(helm-chart): replace regex with wildcard in the ingress rules [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(helm-chart): replace regex with wildcard in the ingress rules [texera] via GitHub
• [D] GitHub Notifications Mechanism [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] GitHub Notifications Mechanism [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] GitHub Notifications Mechanism [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: switch to pekko [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: switch to pekko [texera] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages