Copiers and weed-eaters should be outlawed. Neither work for very long and always break when you really need them.
I have not had good luck with any copier regardless of manufacturer. Canons do seem to have a little better reliability. Bob Fronk From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - Copier Reliability How about any good/bad opinions about Xerox? Specifically for scanning from the copiers? Thx ________________________________ From: N Parr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 9:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - Copier Reliability Ditto ________________________________ From: Ben Nordlander [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - Copier Reliability +1 for canon. Our company uses them in all our offices. We have about 70 of them under lease. Highly suggest you get the fiery's with them. Have had bad experiences with savin and konica. On May 8, 2009 3:25 PM, "David" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I've had more than one copier repairman refer to the Canons as the 'tanks' of the industry, and that is true in my experience. Everyone will have a favorite, but the Canons get my vote for just plain working. David On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Jon Harris <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > We have 2 of the Ko... -- David _____________________ If you don't want to stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them. ~ Redneck saying ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
