True, deNoise works quite well for low grain, ie Alexa but Neat takes it the next level. I've had a few stability issues with Neat and always render it out. Anyone else had issues? On OsX.
Sent from iEarth On 13/11/2012, at 8:14, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> wrote: > Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with > extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me. > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise can >> be enough. >> >> >> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >>>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >>> >>> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >>> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >>> >>> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >>> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >>> video (like most other people here it seems). >>> >>> ++ chris >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
