When you render uv maps, don't filter or antialias them, and you will not have edging issues. Adding bilateral or gaussian blur to everything but the edges helps too. Hope that helps.
R On Aug 3, 2014 3:12 PM, "Patrick Heinen" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm generating the STMap with (x+0.5)/width and (y+0.5/height). It doesn't > seem to be off by a pixel, as everything but that one pixel line is spot > on. As for filtering, I have a case where it shouldn't filter at all as > pixels are getting mapped one to one. I attached an example script that > shows the issue. > Thanks for your help! > > > On 03.08.2014, at 02:51, [email protected] wrote: > > couldn't it be a filtering or multisample problem? > I also had similar problems using STMap for tiling an image, and I ended > up using UVTile > > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> How are you generating the STMap? It might be off by a pixel depending >> how you generated it. >> >> -- >> Deke Kincaid >> Creative Specialist >> The Foundry >> Skype: dekekincaid >> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Mobile: (310) 883 4313 >> Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk >> Email: [email protected] >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Patrick Heinen < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> I'm using an STMap where the original left and right edge of the image >>> touch each other in the image center. When the filtering is set to cubic on >>> the STMap I get a one pixel line at that edge, that I don't get if I ran >>> through the transforms without an STMap. Switching the filtering to >>> Impulse, the line disappears, but obviously everything else looks crappy. I >>> checked the values of the STMap and the source and destination pixels seem >>> to be correct. >>> Has anyone had this problem before? Or has someone maybe an idea, what >>> could cause this? >>> Thanks and enjoy your weekend! >>> >>> Patrick >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
