On Tuesday 13 February 2018 12:03:34 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> In OAK-7203 [1] we're discussing the best location for the
> MountInfoProviderService. The context is that due to the addition of
> the mounts concept a MountInfoProvider implementation is required and
> for OSGi deployment we have to add oak-store-composite.
> 
> There are two options here:
> 
> 1. Move the service to oak-core.
> 2. Require oak-store-composite for deployments
> 
> If we go with 1, we have simpler deployments ( one less bundle ). If we
> go with 2, we split the logic from the oak-store-composite bundle and
> add more stuff on top of oak-core.

1 means simpler deployment and more stuff in oak-core, but the 
MountInfoProvider is required for composite and non-composite stores.
Having it in (experimental) module oak-store-composite feels strange.

Regards,
O.

> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203

Reply via email to