On Tuesday 13 February 2018 12:03:34 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> In OAK-7203  we're discussing the best location for the
> MountInfoProviderService. The context is that due to the addition of
> the mounts concept a MountInfoProvider implementation is required and
> for OSGi deployment we have to add oak-store-composite.
> There are two options here:
> 1. Move the service to oak-core.
> 2. Require oak-store-composite for deployments
> If we go with 1, we have simpler deployments ( one less bundle ). If we
> go with 2, we split the logic from the oak-store-composite bundle and
> add more stuff on top of oak-core.
1 means simpler deployment and more stuff in oak-core, but the
MountInfoProvider is required for composite and non-composite stores.
Having it in (experimental) module oak-store-composite feels strange.
> : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203