On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:10:23 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 11:51 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> > > 1. Move the service to oak-core.
> > > 2. Require oak-store-composite for deployments
> > > 
> > > If we go with 1, we have simpler deployments ( one less bundle ).
> > > If we
> > > go with 2, we split the logic from the oak-store-composite bundle
> > > and
> > > add more stuff on top of oak-core.
> > 
> > 1 means simpler deployment and more stuff in oak-core, but the
> > MountInfoProvider is required for composite and non-composite stores.
> > Having it in (experimental) module oak-store-composite feels strange.
> 
> Why do you consider oak-store-composite experimental? It's not
> documented very well unfortunately, but it's as well-tested as any
> other component in Oak from my point of view.

AFAIR Oak's documentation says it's "experimental". The composite ns page says 
it's work-in-progress – outdated documentation?

O.

> Robert


Reply via email to