On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Ryan S. Dancey wrote:
> Therefore, to suggest that because I happen to work for Wizards of 
> the Coast, each and every single thing that I do in my private life 
> must therefore be an extension of Wizards of the Coast corporate 
> policy is not only inaccurate, but indeed highly insulting.

        Hm.  Ryan, you have spoken about Open Gaming as an official
representative of Wizards of the Coast -- explaining the corporate policy
of which the OGL is a part.  Meanwhile, the OGF website deleted references
and links to Dominion Games which were once there -- coincidentally around
the same time as they decided not to go with the WotC-written OGL.  There
is no mention of the other open-license games which predated the WotC 
push.  Furthermore, you have judged for yourself that the largest 
other open-source-like game (FUDGE) does not match the Foundations
criteria which you wrote -- and thus do not support it.  

        While I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, 
I think the long list of coincidences between WotC policy and your 
personal judgement is at least grounds for suspicion.  As an example, 
you gave an interview with rpg.net where you said: 

   "We make more revenue and more profit from our core rulebooks than any
   other part of our product lines. [...]
   The logical conclusion says that reducing the "cost" to other people to
   publishing and supporting the core D&D game to zero should eventually
   drive support for all other game systems to the lowest level possible
   in the market, create customer resistance to the introduction of new
   systems, and the result of all that "support" redirected to the D&D
   game will be to steadily increase the number of people who play D&D,
   thus driving sales of the core books."  


        I personally would feel better if the OGF website would list the 
Foundation's membership and include in this what their affiliations 
are.  As far as I understand, at this point in time you are the sole 
member of the OGF.  Those who subscribe to the mailing lists may 
express their opinions, but - for example - you have control over 
the OGF website content and have written all of the current text 
about its goals and opinions.  

- John

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to