On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Brad Thompson wrote: > > J. Michael Looney > > > > If you trademark > > "Dunandralis" the OGL would REQUIRE a second license to use it. > > Not if you own it. The owner of the mark could make it Open Content without > a separate license. It would only require a second license if it were not > Open Content. But otherwise yes, a d20 STL-like license would be one way to > handle it. I was assuming for "3rd party" people, not the "official" Dunandralis folk. The OGL does require a secondary license to use ANY trademark, as if we needed that flame fest to start up again. And, yes, that's more than US Trademark law requires. -- http://www.spellbooksoftware.com If guns are outlawed can we use swords? ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Damian
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandr... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandr... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Open Content in Dunandralis MaggieVining
