on 10/13/01 5:34 PM, Richard Stewart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I won't jump your case...
> 
> *grin*

***** Thanx. I'm sure you could have given me a righteous throttling.

> ...BUT the OGL has NOTHING to do with the D20L.  Let me repeat
> this...NOTHING.  The d20 DOES require you to contain a minimum OGC within
> your book and WotC has released _portions_ of the SRD as OGC.  OGL has
> NOTHING to do with D20 though.  In fact it allows you to make a completely
> NEW, yet compatible game to say...D&D WITHOUT stamping it D20.

***** After reading this post and a prior one by woodelf and looking over
the license for a bit I understand where you are coming from. Guess I'm not
as in tune with the license as I'd like to be.

> Example:
> 
> Steve Jackson Games releases GURPS under OGL.  Is has NOTHING to do with
> D20, but it is OGC.  Anyone could then make a GURPS compatible book (thought
> the GURPS trademark/logo could not be used.  So what of all these products
> that WILL be or those products that are compatible with but NOT D20?  They
> are OGL and nothing else.
> 
> That is what I am talking about.

***** OK OK. Now that I understand a OGL logo is a great idea. I'm sure that
anyone producing such content would use it. I know I would. As far as what
type of logo, I like the idea for the d6 with the top open.

Not to boggle minds with another logo, but would it make sense to have a
different mark which would show how much of the content is open? A lot of
people in the stores around here are really interested in the amount of OGC
in a product and some of them won't buy a product if there isn't a
substantial amount of OGC in it. I think a mark which told customers that a
least 50% of this content is open might be a viable idea. That is why I was
pushing for 50% open before.

-- 
Jeffrey J. Visgaitis
Inner Circle Games
http://www.icirclegames.com


_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to