> One potential problem with this solution is it will > create a lot more examination of the products. To me, > 5% is like saying please have *some* OGC in your > product before using this logo. If you put a large > number such as 50% on it then it will require much > more scrutiny to enforce. > > Just a thought. > > Wil
That is a valid point, but what really is the purpose of an OGC logo? If its just another logo to slap on a product it is kinda not needed unless of course you want something in lieu of the D20 logo. To me that doesn't make a whole lot of sense as I'd rather have something to go along with the D20 logo. The big thing I'm noticing with consumers and D20 products now is that they are all looking for a sizeable amount of OGC in each product. This is the whole point behind open gaming and is what is driving this entire movement. If we make a logo that doubles as a moniker for OGC (what consumers want) we all benefit. 50% may be a bit on the large side. I'd say 25%. Make sense? -- Jeffrey J. Visgaitis Inner Circle Games http://www.icirclegames.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
