John Kim wrote: >I don't buy it. If you are dead set on arguing this, >there is a simple test for this which I could try. I could write >out the mind flayer entry in plain English and giving it to people >who aren't D&D players and see what they come up with. > there's also another easy test.
Show us a WotC-written monster who's advancement says "by Charater class" and nothing else, and that isn't at least part humanoid (centuar / drider / etc.) and the point will be refuted. DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
