From: "lizard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ryan S. Dancey wrote: > > > > If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and floats like a > > duck...it's a duck. > > > > I think that writing rules similar to the above would potentially > > trigger a response from WotC. > > Fair enough. This does have the effect (intentional?) of keeping the > mechanics of licensed games closer to D&D, at least if there's any sort > of advancement system.
What if one uses the rules in CoC d20? After all, the most current version of the d20 Trademark License and accompanying Usage Guide allow publishers to say "Requires a Core Rulebook from Wizards of the Coast." Come to think of it, since there is a differences in the character generation rules between D&D and CoC (i.e., no class and its level-dependent benefit, just the character's level-dependent benefits), how does a publisher go about referring to one of the two chargen rules as the most suitable for their product? _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
