Hallo ERic, *, Eric Hoch schrieb: > Wieso?
Weil die TDF es zugelassen hat das sich das Projekt ideologisiert, beispielsweise dadurch das man sich durch die FSF hofieren lässt, siehe beispielsweise: http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Free-Software-Foundation-raet-zu-LibreOffice-1259 195.html Und sich dafür natürlich 'höflich bedankt' indem man in seinem Extensionverzeichnis das durchsetzt was der FSF genehm, aber von der OOo-Community einstmals mit aller Schärfe zurückgewiesen wurde, siehe [1]. Jeder der hinsieht kann auch verstehen was der eigentliche Zweck von Verlautbarungen wie: http://www.fsf.org/news/openoffice-apache-libreoffice/?searchterm=OpenOffice ist. > Was nach einem Wiederspruch aussieht ist, je nach > Blickwinkel, keiner. Entschuldigung Eric, ich sprach hier nicht von Widerspruch, sondern von "mißtrauisch" und meinte das auch so. Worum es geht, und was ich ablehne, ist die Ideologisierung und da ist natürlich Vieles kein Widerspruch sondern sogar gewollt um von den eigentlichen ideologischen Zielen abzulenken. Extremismus im Umfeld von freier und OpenSource-Software lehne ich jedenfalls scharf ab und werde ich NIRGENS unterstützen. <PUNKT> Wenn z.B. manch Andere von FSF/TDF erst bashen lassen und trotzdem anschließend noch TDF/FSF unterstützen ist das deren Entscheidung nicht meine. Gruß Jörg [1] Damalige Stellungnahme des OpenOffice.org-CommunityCouncils im Volltext: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 16:40:58 +0200 From: Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF OpenOffice.org is one of the most popular products of the FOSS (Free/Open Source) community, and for many millions of people it is their first experience of FOSS. Key to OpenOffice.org's success has been its ability to compete openly and freely with competitors on any platform, and demonstrate that FOSS is a better choice. Uniquely among leading office suites, OpenOffice.org provides a mechanism for developers to build and release "extensions" to provide additional features. Extensions can be added and removed at will by users, giving them the freedom to tailor their own copy of OpenOffice.org to do what they need to do. The OpenOffice.org Community has created a common repository where users can select and download extensions. The OpenOffice.org Community Council has been asked by the FSF to give the FSF an effective veto over which extensions should be permitted to appear in this repository. The Community Council has felt unable to do this. We believe passionately that FOSS delivers better software - including extensions, but that users must be free to make the comparison and reach their own conclusion. It is a fact that the vast majority of our users currently run OpenOffice.org on a proprietary operating system, alongside other proprietary software. We respect their choice, and believe the best way to influence them to change is by delivering high quality FOSS software that meets their needs. The OpenOffice.org Community Council regrets that the FSF was unable to accept our compromise proposals for a more clearly signposted extensions repository. We believe the creation of an alternative repository will cause confusion and will lead to a poorer experience for users. However, we are more than happy to work with the FSF to encourage FOSS developers to address areas where proprietary only solutions exist. The OpenOffice.org Community Council http://council.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- Abmelden von der Mailingliste: [email protected] Informationen: http://www.openoffice.org/de/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
