----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2059/#review6332 -----------------------------------------------------------
trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/JavaActionExecutor.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2059/#comment13756> This requirement came up when Mayank tested for multiple NN (federation) support. Without that , multiple NN access was not working. I remember Sanjay Radia proposed to follow this approach to get the URI. However it was a very long time back. - Mohammad On 2012-03-22 17:27:37, Mona Chitnis wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/2059/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2012-03-22 17:27:37) > > > Review request for oozie, Mohammad Islam and Angelo K. Huang. > > > Summary > ------- > > This patch was originally worked on by Mayank Bansal. > I (Mona Chitnis) am in charge of handling this review request. > > Description - adding hadoop.next support for oozie > > > This addresses bug OOZIE-477. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-477 > > > Diffs > ----- > > > trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/MapReduceActionExecutor.java > 1303609 > trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/client/XOozieClient.java > 1303609 > > trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/FsActionExecutor.java > 1303609 > > trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/JavaActionExecutor.java > 1303609 > trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/LauncherMapper.java > 1303609 > trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/WorkflowAppService.java > 1303609 > trunk/core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml 1303609 > > trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestLiteWorkflowAppService.java > 1303609 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2059/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > tested against current unit tests > > > Thanks, > > Mona > >
