On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:32:34PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2005 17:54, John Tsiombikas (Nuclear / the Lab) wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:35:44PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > > I've attached a patch. Using both gcc and g++ got a bit clumsy, since gcc
> > > doesn't know what a class is, and geometry.c includes render.hpp, which
> > > includes float25.hpp, which defines a class. There must be a better way
> > > to do this, so please fix this someone :-).
> >
> > I made everything C++ and did a small code reorganization, seperating
> > the testing code from geometry.c to a seperate source file. Also I
> > cleaned up the Makefile a bit.
> 
> Nice! I just realised that I'd forgotten to put a copyright licence notice in 
> there, so I updated your patch with that. See attachment.

Hmmm, actually this patch is a bit problematic, I tried it on a clean
opengr1_1 dir and it leaves geometry.c and geometry.h behind instead of
removing them :)

Here's a new patch (opengr-1.2.2.patch) that is basically my previous
patch with your licensing comments on top of float25.hpp/cpp, see
attachment.

P.S. did this become confusing yet? :) we really need that repository :)


-- 
John Tsiombikas (Nuclear / the Lab)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://thelab.demoscene.gr/nuclear/

Attachment: opengr-1.2.2.patch.gz
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to