> > > We want two independent video heads.
> >
> > IIRC, 2 dual-link DVI plus s-video.
> 
> The way OGD1 is hooked up:
> Head 1 is connected to 330MHz analog and dual-link DVI.
> Head 2 is connected to TV/s-video and dual-link DVI.
> 
> There are only two video controllers, and lots of pins are shared.
> 
> > Would 1 dual-link DVI plus
> > 1 single-link DVI plus s-video be enough?  Would it save significant
> > space?  Single-link is supposed to be good for up to 1920x1200.  How
> > many people will need to drive two displays both larger than 1920x1200?
> 
> I forget the exact pin arrangement, and I don't want to look it up.
> There is probably too much signal dual-use for this to happen.
> Besides, asking for three video controllers is just too much.

Let me try again.  The suggestion is to take the existing plan and
change one of the DVI from dual-link to single-link.  If that saves
enough gates to be worthwhile.

> Even if the -50 is too small, we can still fit MOST of the design in
> it and do tons of incremental work.

> > There is that FPGA that plugs into an AMD64 socket.  Expensive, and
> > requires a mainboard with at least two CPU sockets, therefore not practical
> > for a mass-production low-cost video solution, but perhaps useful for 
> > development?
> 
> OGD1 has to be practical both for development and for mass sale to
> people who need prototyping boards.

By "mass-production low-cost video solution" I meant OGC1, not OGD1.

> > Perhaps this could be a way to split out some optional 3D stuff, as a couple
> > of us have suggested.  Build a basic ECP2-50 board, and put the fancy 3D 
> > stuff
> > in the AMD64 socket.  The AMD64 socket has direct access to the 
> > hypertransport
> > bus, thus very very high bandwidth available.  This could turn out to be a
> > better solution for high-end 3D than the SLI type kludge.
> 
> Interesting idea, but this would require so much rework on the board
> that we might as well wait until 2007.

It is not obvious to me what would need to be reworked, other than you might 
need
more bandwidth, forcing a change to PCIe.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to