On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:20, Timothy Miller wrote: > Perhaps I made my announcement prematurely, so I'd like to go into > some more detail about what we did, with our assumptions, and see what > everyone else thinks. > > First of all, we do not want to switch parts if we can avoid it. > Using the ECP2-50 has advantages in price, saves us two weeks on OGD1, > and if we can cram a good 3D design into it, that saves us on die area > an
[deleted] Two questions... How much more expensive? OK. It's one... But money talks, so I'll give it a weighting of 2x... If it isn't too expensive, I say take the 2 weeks and doit. Why couldn't we do the ecp2-70 now? (Rather than switch to the Xilinx). (Haven't checked availability, but the ECP2 docs talk about it, so I assumed it was shipping). Is it just really really expensive? H
pgplupnNzsZ8W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
