Elaine,
Thank you. This is ringing a bell now, but I did not internalize it until
one of my libraries complained and documented it. This is really bad. I noticed
it has a high priority but is unassigned. What can we do to get this fixed in
3.2 if not sooner?
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Elaine Hardy
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Scott,
There is a bug report for this
--https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1715697
It is very problematic. Many of or libraries have more than 5 branches and this
bug makes it impossible for them to use the web client
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
Atlanta, GA 30045
404.235.7128 Office
404.548.4241 Cell
404.235.7201 FAX
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:11 AM,
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I just had this reported to me, and it does seem to be problematic. Many of our
libraries use Holdings Maintenance in XUL as the first step in adding volumes
and copies. This works out well because, even if a given library system has no
volumes or copies under a given title, the org unit tree for that system
appears in Holdings Maintenance and you can easily add volumes / copies to a
specific branch. This tree does not appear in the Web Client so adding volumes
to a branch requires several more steps as a user is forced to select the
branch org unit at several junctures. Am I missing something? Has anyone else
noticed this?
Scott
Scott Thomas
Executive Director
PaILS / SPARK
(717) 873-9461<tel:(717)%20873-9461>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Stay informed! Join the SPARK-User Email List:
https://mail.palibrary.org/mailman/listinfo/spark-users
<image002.jpg><http://www.palibrary.org/pails/>
