Mike Christie wrote:
> On 09/04/2009 07:44 AM, Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
>> Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>>> On 09/01/2009 09:53 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>>>> On 09/01/2009 03:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>>>>>> Or, I am ccing you because some time ago Erez was working on support
>>>>>>> for older RHEL and SLES kernels for OFED. It looks like the patch
>>>>>>> below would not be useful to you because iser is supported in those
>>>>>>> kernels, but did you guys all need RHEL 4 and maybe SLES 9 support
>>>>>>> too?
>>>>>> Hi Mike, I'm used to work with patches which have a change log and 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> signed, where this patch lacks both, so I can't really understand 
>>>>>> what
>>>>>> it is about, sorry.
>>>>>>
>>>>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not think a changelog will help either since it is the first
>>>>> version of a RFC patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>    From the subject of the mail and the body it looks like Rakesh is
>>>>> trying to port libiscsi to older distro kernels (RHEL 5 and SLES 10
>>>>> based) so he can support cxgb3i on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am just asking you guys if you also need RHEL 4 and SLES 9 support.
>>>>>
>>>> You guys meaning, do you need iser and does Rakesh need cxgb3i?
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> Yes we do want to support cxgb3i on RHEL4/SLES9. I am sending the
>>> modified patch against current james tree's libiscsi part. This patch
>>> can replace existing 2.6.14-23_compat.patch.
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Here is updated patch that fixes some MACROS to fix compilation issue on
>> RHEL5.0 and SLES10.2
>>
> 
> The idea is that I can just drop in your patch over the existing 
> 2.6.14-23_compat.patch compat patch right?
> 
> cd open-iscsi/kernel
> mv your_patch 2.6.14-23_compat.patch
> make
> 
> (the build system's patching code assumes we are in the kernel dir so I 
> just have to remove the /kernel/ strings from the diff).
> 

Hi Mike,

Yep that would work, BTW this patch applies against libiscsi of james 
tree (after copying related part, I fixed those files inclusion 
directive as to be part of open-iscsi tree).

Regards
Rakesh Ranjan


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to