Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
> Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 09/01/2009 09:53 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>>> On 09/01/2009 03:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>>>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>>>>> Or, I am ccing you because some time ago Erez was working on support
>>>>>> for older RHEL and SLES kernels for OFED. It looks like the patch
>>>>>> below would not be useful to you because iser is supported in those
>>>>>> kernels, but did you guys all need RHEL 4 and maybe SLES 9 support
>>>>>> too?
>>>>> Hi Mike, I'm used to work with patches which have a change log and are
>>>>> signed, where this patch lacks both, so I can't really understand what
>>>>> it is about, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :)
>>>>
>>>> I do not think a changelog will help either since it is the first
>>>> version of a RFC patch.
>>>>
>>>> From the subject of the mail and the body it looks like Rakesh is
>>>> trying to port libiscsi to older distro kernels (RHEL 5 and SLES 10
>>>> based) so he can support cxgb3i on them.
>>>>
>>>> I am just asking you guys if you also need RHEL 4 and SLES 9 support.
>>>>
>>> You guys meaning, do you need iser and does Rakesh need cxgb3i?
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Yes we do want to support cxgb3i on RHEL4/SLES9. I am sending the
>> modified patch against current james tree's libiscsi part. This patch
>> can replace existing 2.6.14-23_compat.patch.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Here is updated patch that fixes some MACROS to fix compilation issue on
> RHEL5.0 and SLES10.2
>
Was the patch in this mail the final version?
What was this for:
+#if !(defined RHELC1) && !(defined SLEC1)
struct delayed_work recovery_work;
+#else
+ struct work_struct recovery_work;
+#endif
And what was the reason for the ifdefs related to this for:
+#if !(defined RHELC1) && !(defined SLEC1) \
+ && (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,19))
task->have_checked_conn = false;
task->last_timeout = jiffies;
task->last_xfer = jiffies;
+#endif
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
