At 1:37 PM -0800 on 11/10/99, Alain Farmer wrote: >Michael Fair: Using the GCC underlying architecture >will create licensing problems unless we reimplement >the whole shebang. > >Alain: We must avoid licencing problems. What are they >in this case? The GPL 'virus'. That is, we'd have to use the GPL. > >Michael Fair: Reimplementing the whole thing does not >sound like an inviting proposition, so I do not balme >one bit. > >Alain: Can we safely use GCC now, then switch later? Legally, probably not :(
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes ... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... Michael Fair
- Re: Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
