Re: Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models

[MP0werd]

>>There are other advantages to this as well in terms
>>of future expansion.  Because we'd be using the gcc
>>bytecodes our stacks could be natively compiled on
>>that platform with no interpreter needed.  The "do"
>>command is a bit tricky, but not unsolvable.
>
>I imagine we'd have to make it do a callback to the interpreter. Could get
>messy, but should be doable.

I wanna Dynamic Linked Library! Runtimes are obselete, DLL's rule (except in 
windblows)