Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models

[Michael Fair]

Using the GCC underlying architecture will create licensing
problems unless we reimplement the whole shebang.

Reimplementing the whole thing does not sound like an
inviting proposition, so I do not balme one bit.

In fact, I am very much for putting this kind of development
on hole for right now, as long as we design and plan for
it in the future.

-- Michael --

DeRobertis wrote:

> At 2:43 PM +0100 on 11/7/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>
> > BTW -- did you check out the new XBlockFile? I'm still waiting for someone
> >to find my mistakes ???
>
> I took a quick glance at it -- have not really tested it yet. But it does
> have serious problems when you try to run the large 20,000 block test once,
> then run it again. Took ~2 ticks/block. Had to nap on it :(
>
> Also, I'm not going to use gcc codes -- don't worry. Maybe later I'd build
> a gcc frontend -- but much later.