I also had an another idea of coupling the sentences along with their id. Ex. Why can't i give sentences like "Apples are sweet, said by id1". "Farmers are starving, said by id2" .So that i would know which sentence has which id. what do you say?
Thanks, Vishnu On Monday, 14 November 2016 21:53:56 UTC+1, linas wrote: > > > A better design would be to explicitly acknowledge that words have > meanings. The way that this is currently done looks roughly like this: > > (EvaluationLink > (PredicateNode "is") > (ListLink > (ConceptNode "apple@meaning-42") > (ConceptNode "fruit@meanning-66") > ) > ) > > I hope the above is "obvious": the 42nd kind of meaning of the word > "apple" is a kind of "fruit", where by "fruit", we mean the 66th entry in > Webster's dictionary. > > (ReferenceLink > (ConceptNode "apple@meaning-42") > (WordNode "apple") > ) > > That tells you the actual word that gets used for meaning-42. This is a > lexical function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_function > > (WordInstanceLink > (SentencNode "id1") > (WordInstanceNode "apple@bf71826c-487e-42df-a941-0ecd3c942a76") > ) > > This tells you that the the word apple occurred in sentence id1 > > (ReferenceLink > (WordInstanceNode "apple@bf71826c-487e-42df-a941-0ecd3c942a76") > (ConceptNode "apple@meaning-42") > ) > > This tells you that the word apple in sentence id1 actually corresponds to > meaning 42. > > See? No context link at all. > > The above oversimplifies things a little bit. Some of the reference links > should probably be EvaluationLinks. The lexical functions need to be > improved, a lot. The current output is documented here: > http://wiki.opencog.org/w/RelEx_OpenCog_format but it could be > over-hauled and improved, its not perfect. > > I believe that the above should work well with PLN, but that remains to be > seen: again Nil is working on this now. > > --linas > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Vishnu Priya <vishnup...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hey Linas! >> >> Thanks for the reply. It's ok. Totally understandable.!! >> >> Yeah just read about ContextLink on wiki. >> >> I have a scenario, where i have sentences that i want to give to NLP >> Pipeline. Along with sentences, i also have an attribute called id. Like a >> reference for sentence. >> Each sentence is associated with an identifier. For me, it would be >> useful when i have the sentences parsed along with their id. >> Later, say i stimulate and get STI, whatever i do, finally i should be >> knowing, to what id the atom belongs to. >> >> So i thought, with something like below, i might achieve that. >> apple is fruit in the context of id1. >> (EvaluationLink >> (ContextLink id1 >> (PredicateNode "is") >> (ListLink >> (ConceptNode "apple") >> (ConceptNode "fruit") >> ) >> ) >> >> >> >> But i don't know, how to input my sentences along with their identifiers. >> Is it possible somehow to do such a thing of incorporating identifiers ? >> or is it totally not doable? >> >> >> --vishnu >> >> >> >> >> On Friday, 11 November 2016 02:30:44 UTC+1, linas wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> sorry just now recovering from system outages and an email overload. >>> >>> ContextLink and how to use it is documented on the wiki. >>> >>> Currently it it not used very much, or at all. >>> >>> ContextLinks only make sense once you know how to asssign meaning to >>> things -- syntax parsing of sentences is far too low-level for this, >>> because you don't yet know what the word "apple" is. >>> >>> --linas >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Vishnu Priya <vishnup...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Linas, >>>> >>>> I would like to know how to use ContextLink. >>>>> >>>> >>>> - The Apple is red in color. >>>> - The Headquarters of apple is in California. >>>> >>>> Each and every sentence of mine has certain context word. >>>> I want the former sentence to be parsed along with ContextLink fruit >>>> and the later as company. So that later, i can identify which atom >>>> belongs >>>> to which context. >>>> Should i make changes at the parser level? What should i do? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Vishnu >>>> >>> >>> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/1333af72-6237-4499-a060-0db4a88b08b0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
