HI,
On one hand there is the notion as used in HL7 where series of messages update databases producing a list of updated measurements. On the other hand there is the notion as used in CEN/TC251 and OpenEHR where documents are used to enhance the raw data by providing a human interpretation and advice by an expert using the updated measurements in the database. Gerard -- Gerard Freriks, MD Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1 TNO-PG Zernikedreef 9 Leiden The Netherlands +31 71 5181388 +31 654 792800 -- <private> -- Gerard Freriks, arts Huigsloterdijk 378 2158 LR Buitenkaag The Netherlands +31 252 544896 +31 654 792800 > From: Sam Heard <sam.heard at bigpond.com> > Reply-To: Sam Heard <sam.heard at bigpond.com> > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:41:47 +0930 > To: Bhupinder Singh <bobdog at sancharnet.in>, Thomas Beale > <thomas at deepthought.com.au>, Openehr-Technical <openehr-technical at > openehr.org> > Subject: RE: Pathology requirements TIMED MEASUREMENTS > > Bhupinder > > The only values we are not wanting to show are those that are wrong - and > have been changed in a later version. The idea behind this is to store the > information in an openEHR system inside the Pathology service and then send > an extract - rather than develop a lot of messages. > > Cheers, Sam - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
