2012/1/25 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>
> Maybe another way of understanding this flag is as 'this node can be
> skipped without loss of meaning'. I would be very interested to know if we
> should make AQL queries sensitive to this flag. Has anyone thought about
> that?
In this sense I can see the reason for this attribute, since it can be
understood as part of the documentation of the clinical model. But
definitely it is not clearly described at the specs since there it seems to
be linked to the presentation template only.
I fact, there is a similar attribute in EN13606 ITEM class, but used in an
opposite sense. The attribute is "emphasis" and it is described as "A way
of denoting that the composer wished to mark this ITEM as being of
particular note (an unusual measurement value, an unexpected outcome,
anything that might be considered necessary to highlight to a future
reader)."
I have never thought about this. I don't know if this kind of annotations
("this item is important or clinically relevant or not") better fits as
part of the RM or part of the AOM. In other words, if this marker is
related to a specific data instance or to a data item definition in an
archetype.
Thoughts on this?
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120125/6c0f2e0b/attachment.html>
