Would this attribute value change depending on where is the archetype
used? i.e. if we use it on a GUI of a smartphone rather than a
standalone or web application
2012/1/25 David Moner <damoca at gmail.com>:
>
> 2012/1/25 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>
>>
>> Maybe another way of understanding this flag is as 'this node can be
>> skipped without loss of meaning'. I would be very interested to know if we
>> should make AQL queries sensitive to this flag. Has anyone thought about
>> that?
>
>
>
> In this sense I can see the reason for this attribute, since it can be
> understood as part of the documentation of the clinical model. But
> definitely it is not clearly described at the specs since there it seems to
> be linked to the presentation template only.
>
> I fact, there is a similar attribute in EN13606 ITEM class, but used in an
> opposite sense. The attribute is "emphasis" and it is described as "A way of
> denoting that the composer wished to mark this ITEM as being of particular
> note (an unusual measurement value, an unexpected outcome, anything that
> might be considered necessary to highlight to a future reader)."
>
> I have never thought about this. I don't know if this kind of annotations
> ("this item is important or clinically relevant or not") better fits as part
> of the RM or part of the AOM. In other words, if this marker is related to a
> specific data instance or to a data item definition in an archetype.
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
>
>
> --
> David Moner Cano
> Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
> Instituto ITACA
> http://www.ibime.upv.es
>
> Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
> Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
> Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
