Joerg Schilling wrote: > Don Cragun <don.cragun at sun.com> wrote: > >>> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:43:53 +0100 >>> From: Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) >>> >>> Don Cragun <don.cragun at sun.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The project team has made minor updates to the proposal to address >>>> concerns raised by Darren, Garrett, and internal project team members. >>>> (GNU rmt will move from /usr/sfw/libexec/grmt to /usr/lib/grmt instead >>>> of /usr/libexec/rmt, man page links will be placed in >>> As I mentioned already, grmt is not needed as the rmt program from star >>> is replacing /etc/rmt ans this rmt implementation is a true superset of the >>> functionality of all known rmt implementation. >> And, has already been pointed out, star has been in the process of >> replacing stuff for well over three years. When you integrate star >> into a Solaris gate, then we can consider dropping support for grmt; >> until then, your proposed replacement for /etc/rmt is not an actual >> replacement for grmt. > > Is there a chance that you come to reality? > > The case PSARC/2004/480 has not been made for fun but because there is a > _need_ > to integrate star into Solaris. > > The people who are currently working on the GNU tar could e.g. do the more > important tasks first and make PSARC/2004/480 reality. > > J?rg >
J?rg - Could you do this yourself? If you're too busy, imagine that others are too. Whatever you do, please stop going on about star. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance barts at cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
