Joseph Kowalski <jek3 at sun.com> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >>> You can break it up across multiple people. Code doesn't get putback
> >>> to Solaris without at least two sets of eyes looking at it. Whether
> >>> it has 1 line of change, or 1M lines of change.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I realize this is the philosophy, but it doesn't really apply to FOSS
> >> code we import. Usually a review happens at the packaging and
> >> documentation level.
> >>
> >
> > As I mentioned already, if GNU tar did have a code review, it could not make
> > it into Solaris.
> >
> > Why should star be treated worse than GNU tar?
> >
> Did you read what I said?
>
> I was supporting your abjection for a full code review.
>
> Let me very clear: I was disputing Garrett's assertion that full code
> review was required (for FOSS).
Sorry, but i do not understand your point.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
