Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> You can break it up across multiple people. Code doesn't get putback >>> to Solaris without at least two sets of eyes looking at it. Whether >>> it has 1 line of change, or 1M lines of change. >>> >>> >> I realize this is the philosophy, but it doesn't really apply to FOSS >> code we import. Usually a review happens at the packaging and >> documentation level. >> > > As I mentioned already, if GNU tar did have a code review, it could not make > it into Solaris. > > Why should star be treated worse than GNU tar? > Did you read what I said?
I was supporting your abjection for a full code review. Let me very clear: I was disputing Garrett's assertion that full code review was required (for FOSS). - jek3
