On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on >Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:17:28 -0800 (PST), Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > tim> sco5-gcc FAILS (removing ${x86_elf_asm} should fix this) > tim> I don't think anyone tries to put gnu ld on > tim> SCO OpenServer 5. > > Uhmm, we're talking gnu as, not gnu ld. Does your statement still > stand?
Duh, yes my statement still stands. Sorry, most of my focus is on getting a server ready to install Monday. > > Also, are there other SCO users on this list with different > experiences, or is it the same for everyone? I wonder if there is even enyone else on the list testing on SCO OpenServer. None of the 0.9.7 sco builds have worked until about a week ago and I've not seen any report from any other SCO user. Any SCO users out there? > > In any case, as far as I see we have two choices for 0.9.7: > > 1. insert the proposed perl filter (it works as stated, and I feel > quite confident with it, since Perl works the same everywhere). I vote for putting the perl filter in the solaris section. It won't do anything for SCO OpenServer but it will make UnixWare/OpenUNIX work and probably any other SVR4. (like ReliantUNIX) > 2. write a blurb in PROBLEMS stating that for assembler modules to > work properly on Intel-based Unixen, it is *required* that GNU as > be installed. > > I can go for either of them. > -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
