> +1 for us to publish sets of projects that work together for specific > scenarios. I heard this idea first from Allison Randall and it > immediately struck a chord. To be fair folks like Jay Pipes have > always said (paraphrasing) "OpenStack is a toolbox". So it's the next > step i guess. Lauren Sell was mentioning yesterday about hearing > confusion around "Big Tent", i do feel that when we put forth a set of > constellations we can start deprecating the "Big Tent" terminology if > appropriate.
I think what we are missing here is more of guidelines and more examples to give ideas how to build a platform from the blocks. I see “Big Tent” as a terminology that covers our governance as well, therefore I would not go that far to deprecate it as of now. On the other hand, I know at least one other community where a very similar concept than the set of constellations here is causing just as much frustration as the “Big Tent” currently in our case. I think we need to improve on communication and guidance first regardless of whether we get to the conclusion of changing the terminology finally or not. Thanks, Ildikó
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
